Magazine 2014
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 4 JULY 2014  
THE REGIONAL IRRIGATION SCENARIO IN MAHARASHTRA  
Veena Devasthali  
ABSTRACT  
The irrigation scenario in Maharashtra has been under media focus for quite some time. The present  
paper traces the development of irrigation in Maharashtra state since its inception. The development  
of irrigation at the state level as well as across the regional divisions has been discussed. The focus  
of the paper is on the vast disparity in the irrigation potential created and the actual area irrigated. It  
also highlights the development of irrigation in terms of major, medium and minor irrigation projects  
across regional divisions. The paper raises some issues of concern for the future policy measures.  
Keywords : Irrigation , development, disparity , regional divisions  
Introduction  
The irrigation scenario in Maharashtra has been the focus of the media for a fairly long period of time.  
Given the current political climate in the state it also appears that it is going to continue to be so for  
quite some time. This is an attempt to explore the regional aspects of the irrigation sector in the state.  
Historical Background  
The Maharashtra state came into existence in 1960. Soon after the inception the First Irrigation  
Commission was appointed by the Maharashtra government. The First Commission estimated that  
only 30 % of the cultivable area could be brought under irrigation. It was also recommended by the  
Commission that this should be done by 1980. However by 1980 approximately only 17% of the  
cultivable area was brought under irrigation. The Second Irrigation Commission was appointed in  
1
995. In 1997 the Commission was renamed as the Second Water and Irrigation Commission. The  
Second Commission estimated that nearly 85 lakh ha i.e. 40% of the cultivable area could be  
brought under irrigation.  
Development of Irrigation – State Level and Across Regional Divisions  
State Level Scenario : 1961 – 2010  
The development of irrigation in the state in the past five decades has been presented in Table 1.  
Table 1 : Creation of Irrigation Potential in Maharashtra : 1961 – 2010  
(
Lakh ha)  
Time Period  
Irrigation Potential Created  
Cumulative Irrigation Potential Created  
1
1
1
1
1
2
961*  
-
03.98  
07.18  
17.30  
26.25  
37.69  
47.37  
961-1969*  
969-1980*  
980-1990*  
990-2001**  
001-2010**  
03.20  
10.12  
08.95  
11.44  
09.65  
Source : * Compiled from Five Year Plans of GoM  
* Compiled from Irrigation Status Report, Department of Irrigation, GoM,  
September2011  
*
From Table 1 it is clear that by 2010 the total irrigation potential created was 47.37 lakh ha. This  
accounts for approximately 22 % of the cultivable area of the state. In other words the irrigation potential  
created does not cover even one fourth of the cultivable area. The progress in the creation of irrigation  
has not been uniform over the past five decades. In the first decade the irrigation potential created was  
only 3.20 lakh ha. However in the successive decades there was considerable increase in the same  
though with fluctuations from decade to decade.  
Regional Scenario : 2001 – 2010  
The development of irrigation sector across the regional divisions reveals a very interesting picture.  
(51)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 4 JULY 2014  
Table 2 : Regional Development : 2001 and 2010  
Lakh ha(%)  
Year Konkan Nashik Pune  
Aurangabad  
8.5  
Amaravati Nagpur  
Maharashtra  
37.7  
2
001 0.7  
6.5  
13.8  
3.4  
4.8  
(
1.9)  
(17.2)  
9.7  
(36.6)  
15.4  
(22.6)  
(9.0)  
4.7  
(12.7)  
6.1  
(100.0)  
47.4  
2
010 1.0  
10.5  
(
2.1)  
(20.3)  
(32.3)  
(22.0)  
(9.9)  
(12.8)  
(100.0)  
Source : Compiled from Irrigation Status Report, Department of Irrigation, GoM,  
September 2011  
It can be seen from Table 2 that the regional development of the irrigation sector has been rather  
uneven. The irrigation potential in 2001 was highest (36.6) in Pune division. This was followed by  
Aurangabad division (22.6%) and Nashik division (17.2%) respectively. Though Pune division accounted  
for the largest potential in 2010 as well its share in the total potential declined to 32.3% in 2010. Though  
Aurangabad and Nashik divisions followed Pune division again in 2010 there was a change in their  
shares in 2010. While the share of Aurangabad division declined marginally to 22 % there was significant  
increase in the share of Nashik division from 17.2 % to 20.3%. All three divisions together accounted  
for 76.8% of the total irrigation potential created in 2001 and 74.6% in 2010 respectively. The remaining  
three divisions vizAmaravati, Nagpur and Konkan though recorded an increase in the irrigation potential  
created, together they accounted for 23% and 25% of the irrigation potential in 2001 and 2010  
respectively. The share of Konkan division was the lowest in 2001 as well as 2010.  
The yearly changes in the creation of irrigation potential of all the divisions is presented in Table 3. This  
brings out the variations in the creation of the irrigation potential across the divisions in a clear manner.  
Table 3 : Regional Development : 2001 – 2010  
(
Lakh ha)  
Year  
Konkan Nashik Pune Aurangabad  
Amaravati Nagpur Maharashtra  
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
001  
002  
003  
004  
005  
006  
007  
008  
009  
010  
0.7  
0.7  
0.8  
0.8  
0.8  
0.8  
0.8  
0.9  
0.9  
1.0  
6.5  
6.6  
6.6  
6.6  
6.7  
6.8  
7.2  
7.4  
9.5  
9.7  
3.2  
13.8  
13.9  
14.3  
14.6  
15.1  
15.6  
16.3  
16.6  
15.1  
15.4  
1.6  
8.5  
8.6  
8.6  
8.7  
8.8  
9.1  
9.5  
9.8  
10.2  
10.5  
2.0  
3.4  
3.5  
3.5  
3.6  
3.8  
3.9  
4.1  
4.3  
4.6  
4.7  
1.3  
4.8  
4.8  
4.8  
4.8  
4.8  
5.1  
5.4  
5.8  
6.0  
6.1  
1.3  
37.7  
38.1  
38.6  
39.1  
40.0  
41.3  
43.3  
44.8  
46.3  
47.4  
9.7  
2
001-2010 0.3  
Source : Irrigation Status Report, Department of Irrigation, GoM, September 2011  
It can be seen from Table 3 that the regional development of the irrigation sector has been rather  
uneven. During 2001-2010 the total irrigation potential created was 9.7 lakh ha. The creation of potential  
was highest for Nashik division (3.2 lakh ha) followed by Aurangabad division (2.0 lakh ha) and Pune  
division (1.6 lakh ha). The potential created in both Amaravati and Nagpur divisions was 1.3 lakh ha  
each. The Konkan division accounted for the lowest potential in the state. It was 0.3 lakh ha.  
The regional picture of this decade however reveals an interesting picture. The overall irrigation potential  
of Pune division was consistently highest throughout this decade. The next two divisions were  
Aurangabad and Nashik divisions. There was hardly any addition to the irrigation potential in Nagpur  
division during the first half of the decade. The addition to the irrigation potential was observed from  
the year 2006 onwards. Amaravati division like other divisions recorded small but consistent addition.  
The addition to the irrigation potential in Konkan division throughout this decade was small and not  
consistent.  
The extent of cultivable area, irrigation potential and irrigated area across the regional divisions as on  
th  
3
0 June,2010has been presented in Table 4.  
(52)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 4 JULY 2014  
th  
Table 4 :Cultivable Area, Irrigation Potential and Irrigated Area – 30 June 2010  
Lakh ha (%)  
Regional Division Cultivable Area  
Creation of Irrigation Potential  
00.98 (2)  
Irrigated Area  
00.12 (0.4)  
05.28 (18)  
14.63 (50)  
04.35 (15)  
01.83 (6)  
Konkan  
15.4 (7)  
Nashik  
40.0 (19)  
43.1 (20)  
56.5 (26)  
43.8 (21)  
23.3 (11)  
211.99 (100)  
09.67 (20)  
Pune  
15.41 (32)  
Aurangabad  
Amaravati  
Nagpur  
10.51 (22)  
04.67 (9)  
06.10 (12)  
03.34 (11)  
29.55 (100)  
Maharashtra  
47.37 (100)  
Source : Same as Table 2  
The largest cultivable area (26%) in the state was in Aurangabad division. This was followed by three  
divisions vizAmaravati (21%), Pune (20%) and Nashik (19%) divisions. Nagpur division and Konkan  
division accounted for only 11 % and 7 % of the cultivable area respectively. However the creation of  
irrigation potential doesn’t reflect the same pattern. The highest potential i.e. 32 % was created in Pune  
division. This was followed by Aurangabad division (22%) and Nashik division (20%). Despite having  
21% of the total cultivable area in the state the creation of irrigation potential in Amaravati division was  
only 9%. The extent of irrigation potential created in Nagpur and Konkan divisions was 12% and 2 %  
respectively.  
The differences are even more pronounced in case of actual irrigated area. The total irrigated area at the  
state level is 29.55 lakh ha. Out of the total irrigated area Pune division accounted for 50 % of the area.  
The next two divisions vizNashik and Aurangabad together accounted for only 18% and 15% of the  
irrigated area respectively. Both these divisions together accounted for less irrigated area than Pune  
division. The irrigated area of Nagpur division was 11% and that of Konkan division was just o.4%. What  
is however very alarming is that the area brought under irrigation in Amaravati division is only 6%. In  
terms of both the creation of irrigation potential and the actual irrigated area this division has suffered  
from the uneven development.  
Table 5 :Extent of the Utilisation of Irrigation Potential  
Regional  
Division  
Creation of Irrigation  
Potential as on 30 June  
Irrigated Area  
2010-2011(Lakh ha) Irrigated Area  
to Potential Created (%)  
Percentage of  
th  
2
010 (Lakh ha)  
Konkan  
00.98  
09.67  
15.41  
10.51  
04.67  
06.10  
47.37  
0.12  
5.28  
14.63  
4.35  
1.83  
3.34  
29.55  
12  
Nashik  
54  
95  
41  
39  
55  
62  
Pune  
Aurangabad  
Amaravati  
Nagpur  
Maharashtra  
Source : Same as Table 2  
The utilisation of the irrigation potential created within each region was also rather uneven (Table 5).  
The utilisation at the state level was 62 %. However there are glaring regional imbalances. The  
performance of only Pune division was well above the average state level. It was 95% for Pune division.  
No other division comes anywhere near Pune division. The performance of all the other divisions  
ranges between 12 % for Konkan division to 55% for Nagpur division and 54% for Nashik division.  
The scenario in terms of the performance of major, medium and minor projects also reveals a very  
interesting pattern.  
(53)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 4 JULY 2014  
Table 6 :Regional Divisions – Types of Projects  
(
No.)  
Regional Division Major  
Medium Minor  
Total  
193  
594  
839  
1064  
415  
Konkan  
04  
16  
23  
11  
11  
14  
79  
09  
45  
180  
533  
770  
973  
381  
411  
3248  
Nashik  
Pune  
46  
80  
Aurangabad  
Amaravati  
Nagpur  
23  
45  
470  
3575  
Maharashtra  
248  
Source : Same as Table 2  
The largest number of total projects were in Aurangabad division This was closely followed by Pune  
division. Pune division accounted for the largest number of major projects whereas largest number of  
medium and minor projects were in Aurangabad division. The number of all types of projects was the  
lowest in the Konkan division.  
Table 7 : Major Projects – Creation of Irrigation Potential and Irrigated Area  
Regional  
Division  
Number of Creation of  
IrrigatedArea Percentage of  
Projects  
Irrigation Potential  
– 2010-2011  
irrigated area  
as on 30th June 2010 (Lakh ha)  
to creation of  
(
Lakh ha)  
irrigation potential (%)  
Konkan  
Nashik  
Pune  
04  
16  
23  
00.52  
04.86  
10.61  
05.33  
01.91  
03.09  
26.32  
00.04  
30.13  
10.91  
02.85  
00.65  
01.75  
19.33  
07.69  
64.40  
102.83  
53.47  
34.03  
56.63  
73.44  
Aurangabad 11  
Amaravati  
Nagpur  
11  
14  
Maharashtra 79  
Source : Same as Table 2  
The largest number of major projects were in Pune division. This division had 23 major projects. This  
was followed by Nashik division with 16 and Nagpur division with 14 major projects. There were 11  
projects each in Aurangabad and Amaravati divisions and only four projects in Konkan division.There  
were variations in terms of the utilisation of the irrigation potential created. At the state level the extent  
of utilisation by way of major projects was73%. The extent of utilisation was highest for Pune division.  
In no other division the extent of utilisation was above that of the average of the state.  
Table 8 : Medium Projects – Creation of Irrigation Potential and Irrigated Area  
Regional  
Division  
Number of Creation of Irrigation  
Irrigated Area Percentage of  
Projects  
Potentialas on  
2010-2011  
(Lakh ha)  
irrigated area to  
creation of irrigation  
potential  
th  
30 June 2010  
(
Lakh ha)  
Konkan  
9
o.17  
2.11  
1.91  
1.69  
1.23  
1.35  
8.46  
0.09  
1.30  
1.24  
0.60  
0.50  
0.81  
4.54  
52.94  
61.61  
64.92  
35.50  
40.65  
60.00  
52.84  
Nashik  
45  
46  
80  
23  
45  
248  
Pune  
Aurangabad  
Amaravati  
Nagpur  
Maharashtra  
Source : Same as Table 2  
(54)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 4 JULY 2014  
There are variations in terms of the number of medium projects as well across the regional divisions.  
The highest number of medium projects were in Aurangabad division.This was followed by Pune  
division with 46 projects and Nashik and Nagpur divisions each with 45 projects. Amaravati and  
Konkan divisions accounted for 23 and nine projects respectively. Overall utilisation of the potential  
of the state was 52.84% which was lower than that of the major projects. Despite having largest  
number of projects in Aurangabad division in terms of the utilisation of potential created the  
performance was not good. It recorded the lowest performance. The performance of Amaravati  
division was also lower than the average state level performance. The highest performance again  
was that of Pune division which was 64.92% but the performance of Nashik and Nagpur divisions  
was also significant i.e. 61.61% and 60% respectively. The performance of Konkan division was  
similar to that of the average state performance.  
Table 9 : Minor Projects – Creation of Irrigation Potential and Irrigated Area  
Regional  
Divisions  
Number of  
Projects  
Creation of  
Irrigation  
Irrigated Area –  
2010-2011  
(Lakh ha)  
Percentage of  
Irrigated AreaTo  
Creation of  
Potential as on  
th  
30  
June 2010  
Irrigation  
(
Lakh ha)  
Potential (%)  
Konkan  
180  
533  
770  
973  
381  
411  
3248  
0.29  
2.73  
2.90  
3.49  
1.53  
1.67  
12.59  
0.08  
0.84  
2.48  
0.90  
0.68  
0.77  
5.75  
27.59  
30.77  
85.52  
25.79  
44.44  
46.11  
45.67  
Nashik  
Pune  
Aurangabad  
Amaravati  
Nagpur  
Maharashtra  
Source : Same as Table 2  
The creation of irrigation potential and the irrigated area by way of minor projects accounted for 12.59  
lakh ha and 5.76 lakh ha respectively. The overall utilisation at the state level was 45.67%. Inthis case  
also Pune division recorded highest utilisation i.e. 85.52%. Though there were largest number of minor  
projects in Aurangabad division the extent of utilisation was just 25.79% which was even lower than  
that of Konkan division.The performance of Nashik division (30%) was also below that of the average  
performance of the state. The utilisation of Nagpur division (46%) was a little above and that of Amaravati  
division (44%) was a little below that of the average state performance.  
IV Issues of Concern  
The ultimate irrigation potential of the state is 85 lakh ha. The potential created is 47.37 lakh ha and the  
irrigated area is 29.55 lakh ha. It has taken nearly five decades to create and utilise this potential. How  
long will it take to create the potential for the remaining 37.63 lakh ha and how much longer will it take  
to utilise the created potential ? The state has a long way to go to improve the utilisation of the  
potential created so far. The development of irrigation sector is far from uniform. It is necessary to  
improve the regional balance in terms of both the creation of potential and the utilisation of the same.  
It has been estimated that only 40% of the cultivable area can be brought under irrigation. There is also  
an urgent need to explore the alternatives for the remaining 60% of the cultivable area which is not  
likely to be brought under the irrigation.  
References  
GoM : Five Year Plans  
GoM (2011) : Irrigation Status Report, Department of Irrigation, September 2011  
Dr. Veena Devasthali : Associate Professor, P. G. Dept. of Economics, SNDT Women’s University,  
Mumbai  
(55)