Magazine 2017
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 7 SEPT. 2017  
THE ABILITY OF BUDGET ADEQUACY  
MODERATES THE EFFECT OF BUDGET PARTICIPATION  
ON BUDGETARY SLACK  
*
Vazria Ulfa Liandini,* Ni Putu Sri Harta Mimba ,  
* **  
*
Ni Gusti Putu Wirawati , Ni Putu Rediatni Giri  
ABSTRACT  
This study aims to obtain empirical evidence of the effect of budget participation on budgetary slack  
as well as to know how the adequacy of the budget moderates such effect. This study uses The  
Agency Theory. The respondents of this study are managers and employees involved in the budgeting  
process at 126 construction companies in Denpasar City. Using the purposive sampling tehnique, 39  
construction companies are chosen. Questionnaire is used for data collection method. Data analysis  
technique used is the simple linear regression analysis and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA).  
The results of this study show that budgetary participation has a significant positive effect on budgetary  
slack. The variable of the adequacy of budget weakens the influence of budgetary participation on  
budgetary slack.  
Keywords: the adequacy of budget, budget participation, budgetary slack  
INTRODUCTION  
Budget is the element of management control system that serves as planning and control tools so that  
managers can carry out the organization’s activities more effectively and efficiently (Schief and Lewin, 1970;  
Welsch, Hilton and Gordon, 1996; Ikhsan and Ane, 2007). As a planning tool, the budget is an action plan  
that consists of a number of targets to be achieved by the department manager of a company in carrying out  
a series of specific activities in the future. While as a means of control, budget plays a role in terms of  
performance assessment managers to see the extent to which managers can achieve the targets set in the  
budget.  
Baiman (1982) says that budget participation will provide the opportunity for employers to gain access to  
local information that allows subordinates to inform private information they have. Budget participation can  
also lead to dysfunctional behavior, such as the tendency of managers to create a budgetary slack. Efforts in  
making a budgetary slack is done by raising costs or degrading revenue from their optimal level in order to  
achieve budget targets easier.  
The theory underlying the concept of budgetary slack is agency theory (agency theory). Agency theory is a  
concept that describes the relationship between the party giving the mandate (principal) and the parties do  
all the activities on behalf of the principal (the agent) as decision makers.  
Research on the relationship between budgetary participation and budgetary slack has been conducted, but  
the studies still show inconsistent results. Research conducted by Onsi (1973), Camman (1976), Baiman  
(
1982), Merchant (1985), Dunk (1993), Kristianto (2009), and Sugiwardani (2012) show that the participation  
of the budget reduces the amount of budgetary slack. However, the results of research conducted by Lowe  
and Shaw (1968), Young (1985), Antie and Eppen (1985), Lukka (1988) , Asriningati (2006), Falikhatun (2007),  
Ikhsan and Ane (2007), Infallible (2009) and Kartika (2010) indicates that the subordinate participation in the  
preparation of the budget will increase budgetary slack. This means that the subordinates do not provide  
proper information in the preparation of the budget. Hence, this reduces the accuracy in the preparation of  
the budget.  
These inconsistency results is the motivation of this study. Govindarajan (1986) suggests that the difference  
in results can be further studied using the contingency approach. This is done by adding another variable  
(36)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 7 SEPT. 2017  
that may have an influence on the effect of budget participation on budgetary slack, such as the adequacy of  
the budget. The budget adequacy is the level of individual perception that the budgeted resources are  
sufficient to carry out the required activities (Supriyono 2004 in Indarto and Stephana, 2011).  
Research conducted by Paters (1980) in Indarto and Stephana (2011) finds the adequacy of budget as one  
of the situational factors that will affect managerial performance. The managers and employees who have  
adequate budgetary support will be able to achieve a higher performance than those without sufficient  
budgetary support.  
This study uses the construction companies in Bali, because this sector has a relatively big role in stimulating  
national development in Indonesia. In 2014, the construction sector was the leading sector for the economy  
of Indonesia (BPS Bali, 2014). In addition, the construction company in the city of Denpasar selected as  
research sites is also due to industrial development in Denpasar as the use of services of construction  
contractors is growing, as shown in Table 1.  
Table 1.  
Number of Company / Business Sector Construction of Bali Province  
Year 2013 - 2014  
District/City  
Number of Company / Business Sector  
Construction of Bali Province  
2
013  
2014  
Jembrana  
Tabanan  
Badung  
Gianyar  
Klungkung  
Bangli  
Karangasem  
Buleleng  
Denpasar  
Jumlah  
106  
130  
187  
232  
182  
213  
263  
221  
345  
109  
168  
236  
248  
191  
221  
280  
225  
417  
2095  
1879  
Source : Central Bureau of Statistics, 2014  
Table 1 shows that in 2014, Denpasar City has the largest number of construction companies compared with  
other districts in Bali. The number of construction companies are legal entities including CV, PT, Firma,  
cooperatives, and others. A large number of business entities that offer construction services as shown in  
Table 1, indicate a fairly strong competition between providers of construction services in the city of Denpasar.  
With the existence of such competition, the construction company would further improve its performance,  
including in terms of budgeting so that corporate objectives can be achieved more effectively and efficiently.  
Budget preparation activities at construction companies is very significant for the implementation of construction  
projects that require a very high cost and not least so that the construction company was selected as the  
object in this study. Construction companies listed in the National Construction Contractors Association of  
Indonesia (GAPENSI) in Denpasar in 2014 had the highest proportion compared to other regencies / cities,  
namely 39 companies were incorporated Limited Liability Company (PT).  
Onsi research results (1973), Camman (1976), and Merchant (1985) shows that participation in budget  
preparation can reduce the number of budgetary slack. This happens because subordinates help provide  
personal information about future prospects so that the budget is prepared to be more accurate. When  
subordinates are given the opportunity to participate in the budgeting process, then subordinates have the  
opportunity to create a budgetary slack. Falikhatun (2007) and Asriningati (2006) also argue that the  
participation budgeting has a significant positive effect on budgetary slack. Based on the above discussion,  
then the hypothesis of this study can be formulated as follows:  
(37)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 7 SEPT. 2017  
H1: Participation budget has a positive effect on budgetary slack.  
The budget adequacy is the degree to which a person feels that the sources of the budget is enough or  
sufficient to meet requirements in the field of work, where the subordinates have information that is influential  
in terms of the level of budget support desired to complete the tasks in their field of work (Nouri and Parker,  
1
998). Hariyanti (2002) explains that better information about the adequacy of the budget that you want to  
carry out his duties owned by subordinates and they will try to incorporate this information into the budget to  
ensure that they have the resources sufficient to carry out their tasks with success, so that the budgeting  
participation subordinates will provide information about the level of budgetary resources that are adequate.  
Managers and employees with the support of sufficient or adequate budgets generally have better performance  
than those that are not supported by a sufficient budget.  
Based on the research results of Nouri and Parker (1998) in Ikhsan and Ane (2007), budget participation has  
a positive relationship with the adequacy of budget and indirectly affects the relationship of budget  
participation. With the participation in the preparation of anggaran, subordinates will provide information  
about the level of budgetary resources which are adequate. Ikhsan research and Ane (2007) showed that the  
adequacy of the budget is the pure moderator in the relationship between budgetary participation and  
budgetary slack, which means that the budgetary participation and budget adequacy jointly affect budgetary  
slack. Based on the above, then the hypothesis in this study can be formulated as follows:  
H2: Budget adequacy weakens the influence of budget participation on budgetary slack.  
Research Method  
This study uses a qualitative associative approach and was conducted at construction companies in Denpasar.  
A large number of business entities that offer construction services lead to fairly a strong competition between  
providers of construction services in the city of Denpasar. Having such a tight competition, the construction  
companies would further improve their performance, including in terms of budgeting. Hence, their objectives  
can be achieved more effectively and efficiently.  
This study uses independent, dependent and moderating variables. Budgetary slack is used in this study as  
the dependent variable. Budgetary slack is the difference between the budget amount reported by  
subordinates with a budget amount that corresponds to the company’s best estimate. Questionnaire consists  
of the following five indicators: standard in the budget, budget execution, budget constraints, the target of a  
tight budget and budget efficiency level.  
The independent variable in this study is budget participation that refers to the participation of many parties  
in a budgeting process. Answer is measured using a Likert scale. This instrument was developed by Ryadi  
(
2015) which consists of five indicators, namely involvement in budgeting, in the opinion of budgeting,  
influence the final outcome budget, contributions in budgeting and request the opinion of the leadership.  
The moderating variable is the budget adequacy, which refers to the adequacy of the budget is the level of  
one’s perception of the amount of budgetary resources owned in meeting all the activities undertaken to  
achieve a goal. Questionnaires are measured using a Likert Scale. This instrument was developed by Hariyanti  
(
2002) which consists of three indicators, namely: the influence of the budget in completion of work,  
achievement of the objectives with the available budget and confidence completion of tasks within the budget  
available.  
The data used in this research is quantitative data. Quantitative data obtained from qualitative data is quantified  
with the aid of a questionnaire which refers to the measurement of the variables used. The data used in this  
study is primary data and secondary data. Primary data in this study was obtained from the respondents to  
each question in the questionnaire. Secondary data in this research is data construction company in the city  
of Denpasar accessed from the publication of the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) in 2014.  
The population in this study are all managers and employees involved in the budgeting process at 126  
construction companies in the city of Denpasar. Using the purposive sampling technique, samples used in  
(38)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 7 SEPT. 2017  
this study are employees and finance managers who are involved in the budgeting process from 39  
construction companies who have held their current position for at least two years, to assure that they have  
sufficient experiences in budgeting. Construction companies in this study are the construction companies  
incorporated in the Joint Implementation of National Construction (GAPENSI) Denpasar and are still active.  
The simple linear regression analysis is used to test the effect of budgetary participation on budgetary slack.  
Moderation regression analysis is used to test the moderating variables, namely the adequacy of the budget  
in relation to budgetary participation and budgetary slack. In addition, this study has also done validity test,  
reliability test, classic assumption test, test the coefficient of determination, significant test F and partial test  
(
t test).  
Results  
The characteristics of respondents examined included gender, education, length of service and job title.  
Table 2 shows that the number of observations (N) in this study are 84.  
Table 2.  
Descriptive Statistics Analysis Result  
Variabel  
N
84  
84  
84  
Min.  
5,00  
3,00  
5,00  
Max.  
21,34  
13,58  
21,76  
Mean  
17,44  
10,62  
17,03  
Std. Deviasi  
4,34  
Budget Participation (X1)  
Budget Adequacy (X2)  
Budgetary Slack (Y)  
2,53  
3,87  
Source: Data processed, 2016  
Validity test is used to measure the validity of questionnaires. An instrument is said to be valid if the correlation  
coefficient (r) calculate that value is greater than r table, namely above 0.3 (r> 0.3). Validity test results in  
Table 3 indicate that all variables have a correlation coefficient with the total score of the entire item statement  
greater than 0.30.  
Table 3.  
Validation Test Result  
Kode  
Instrumen  
X1.1  
X1.2  
X1.3  
X1.4  
X1.5  
X2.1  
X2.2  
X2.3  
Y1  
Nilai Pearson  
Correlation  
0,901  
Variabel  
Budget Participation (X1)  
Keterangan  
Valid  
0,939  
0,953  
0,944  
0,960  
0,943  
0,977  
0,974  
0,949  
Valid  
Valid  
Valid  
Valid  
Valid  
Valid  
Valid  
Valid  
Budget Adequacy (X2)  
Budgetary Slack (Y)  
Y2  
0,933  
Valid  
Y3  
0,961  
Valid  
Y4  
0,918  
Valid  
Y5  
0,905  
Valid  
Source : Data processed, 2016  
The reliability test shows that a measurement can provide consistent results when the measurements are  
done with the same symptoms. Instrument used is called reliable if the Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients> 0.60.  
Based on the reliability test results presented in Table 4, it can be concluded variables used in this study are  
reliable which can be seen from Cronbach’s Alpha value of each variable which is greater than 0.60.  
(39)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 7 SEPT. 2017  
Table 4.  
Realibilaty Test Result  
Variabel  
Cronbach’s Alpha  
0,967  
Keterangan  
Reliable  
Reliable  
Budget Participation (X1)  
Budget Adequacy (X2)  
Budgetary Slack (Y)  
0,962  
0,963  
Reliable  
Source: Data processed, 2016  
Prior to the regression analysis, a regression model must pass the test of classic assumptions, as shown in  
Table 5. Both the regression model in this study meet the test of normality and normal distribution because  
the value Asymp. Sig. is greater than 0.05.  
Table 5.  
Normality Test Result  
No  
1
2
Persamaan  
Z
Asymp. Sig.  
0,068  
Y = á + â X + å  
0,093  
0,097  
1
.
1
Y = á + â X + â X + â (X X ) + å  
0,052  
1
.
1
2.  
2
3
1.  
2
Source: Data processed, 2016  
Heteroskedasticity test aims to test whether the regression model occurred inequality residual variance from  
one observation to another observation. Based on Table 6 above it can be seen, the significant value of each  
variable in the second regression model value is greater than 0.05. This shows that both the regression  
model is free of symptoms heterokedastisitas.  
Table 6.  
Heteroskedastisity Test Result  
No  
1
2
Similarity  
Y = a + b X + e  
Y = á + â X + â X + â (X X ) + å  
Variable  
X1  
X1  
X2  
X1X2  
t
Sig.  
-1,679  
0,076  
-1,242  
-0,530  
0,097  
0,940  
0,218  
0,598  
1
1
1
.
1
2.  
2
3
1.  
2
Source: Data processed, 2016  
This study uses a simple linear regression analysis and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) to determine  
the extent to which the relationship between the independent variable on the dependent variable are shown  
in Table 7 for a simple linear regression analysis and Table 8 for Moderated Regression analysis (MRA).  
Table 7.  
Simple Linear Regression Analysis  
Variabel  
Unstandardized  
Coefficients  
B
Standardized  
Coefficients  
Beta  
t
Sig  
Std. Error  
1,115  
(
Constant)  
4,958  
0,692  
4,447  
11,156  
0,000  
0,000  
X1  
0,062  
0,776  
Adjusted R Square  
F hitung  
Sig F hitung  
0,598  
124,464  
0,000  
Source : Data processed, 2016  
(40)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 7 SEPT. 2017  
Based on Table 7 above, the regression equation is as follows:  
Y = 4,958+ 0,692X ..........................................................(1)  
1
Constant value (á) of 4.958 means that if the variable is declared constant budget participation at 0, then the  
value of budgetary slack is equal to 4.958. The regression coefficient (â) in the variable participation budget  
is of 0,692. The regression coefficient is positive, meaning if the participation of the budget increased by one  
unit, then the budgetary slack will increase by 0,692 units.  
Table 8.  
Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA)  
Variabel  
Unstandardized  
Coefficients  
B
Standardized  
Coefficients  
Beta  
t
Sig  
Std. Error  
2,472  
(
Constant)  
-1,916  
0,914  
1,330  
-0,057  
-0,775  
4,257  
3,709  
-2,657  
0,440  
0,000  
0,000  
0,010  
X1  
X2  
X1*X2  
0,215  
0,359  
0,022  
1,026  
0,871  
-1,048  
Adjusted R Square  
F hitung  
Signifikansi F  
0,651  
52,667  
0,000  
Source : Data processed, 2016  
Based on Table 8 above, the regression equation is as follows:  
Y = -1,916 + 0,914X + 1,330X - 0,057(X .X )...................... (2)  
1
2
1
2
The constant value of -1.916 indicates that if the participation of the budget (X1) and the adequacy of the  
budgets (X2) equal to zero, then the value of budgetary slack will decrease by approximately -1.916. The  
regression coefficient budget participation (b1) of 0.914 indicates if the role of budgetary participation increases  
by one unit, it will result in an increase in the budgetary slack (Y) amounting to 0.914 units, assuming other  
variables are equal to zero.  
The regression coefficient budget (b2) of 1.330 indicates if the role of the adequacy of the budget is increased  
by one unit, it will result in an increase in the budgetary slack (Y) amounted to 1,330 units, assuming other  
variables are equal to zero. X1.X2 moderate coefficient value (b3) of -0.057 indicates that every interaction  
the role of budgetary participation and adequacy of the budget increased by one unit will lead to a reduction  
in budgetary slack amounted to 0.057 units.  
The coefficient of determination (R2) aims to measure the ability of the model to explain variations in the  
dependent variable. The results adjusted R square in Equation 1 is 0.598. It shows that 60% of budgetary  
slack variation can be explained by the participation of the budget, while the remaining 40% is explained by  
other variables outside the model. The results adjusted R square in Equation 2 is 0.651. This shows that 65%  
of budgetary slack variation can be explained by the participation of the budget as well as moderated by the  
variable adequacy of the budget, while the remaining 35% is explained by other variables outside the model.  
F test results indicates that the calculated F value of 52.667 with significant F or p-value of 0.0000 which is  
smaller than the value = 0.05, then the simple linear regression model is fit for use as an analytical tool to  
examine the independent variables and the dependent moderation variable.  
(41)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
Table 7 shows that the value of b1 is 0,692 and the level of significance for variable budget participation of  
.000. 0,000 value is smaller than 0.05 which indicates that participation variable budget has significant  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 7 SEPT. 2017  
0
positive effect on budgetary slack. This indicates that the participation of the budget will significantly increase  
budgetary slack, so the first hypothesis in this study may be accepted. Hence, this study finds that the higher  
the level of participation in the budgeting process at a construction company, the potential for the creation of  
budgetary slack will be higher.  
Based on the calculation results shown in Table 7, it is known that the value of b3 is -0.057 and significance  
level of 0,010. 0,010 value smaller than 0.05 indicates that the variable budget adequacy has a negative  
effect on the relationship of budget participation on budgetary slack. This indicates that in this study the  
adequacy of the budget weakens the relationship between budgetary participation on budgetary slack because  
it has a coefficient (b3) which is negative.  
The success of an organization depends on the circumstances in which the budget is able to support  
operational activities. Adequacy of the budget is able to carry out activities within the organization properly if  
the fulfillment of budgetary resources is required. Managers and employees with the support of sufficient or  
adequate budgets generally have better performance than those that are not supported by a sufficient budget.  
The results of this study are supported by a previous study conducted by Ikhsan and Ane (2007) and Kosasih  
(
2013) which states that the adequacy of the budget moderating influence of budget participation with  
budgetary slack.  
Conclusions and Recommendations  
Based on the previous discussions, it can be concluded that there is a significant positive effect of budget  
participation on budgetary slack. Variable budget adequacy weakens the influence of budget participation  
on budgetary slack. This means that the higher level of the budget adequacy of construction companies, it  
will be more possible to reduce the occurrence of budgetary slack through the process of budget participation.  
Advice that can be proposed for construction companies is that the budgetary slack should be controlled by  
the parties who are involved in the budgeting process to improve the planning and control activities. Managers  
must take into consideration the possibility of budgetary slack by implementing policies that can increse the  
employees’ commitment to achieve the goals and values of the company.  
References :  
Antie, Rick., and Gary D. Eppen. 1985. Capital Rationing and Organizational Slack in Capital Budgeting.  
Management Science, (31), Issue 2. pages 163-174.  
BPS Provinsi Bali. 2014. Direktori Perusahaan Konstruksi Provinsi Bali 2014. Denpasar: BPS Provinsi  
Bali.  
Brownell, P. 1982. Participation and Budgeting Process: When it Works and When it Doesn’t. Journal of  
Accounting Literature, (1), pp: 124-153.  
Camman, Cortlandt. 1976. Effects of The Use of Control Systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society,  
(
1) (4), pp. 301-313.  
Chiristina, Vitha. 2009. Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Senjangan Anggaran dengan  
Ketidakpastian Lingkungan Sebagai Variabel Moderating pada PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero)  
Tbk, Jawa Bagian Barat. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sumatera Utara.  
(42)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 7 SEPT. 2017  
Dunk, Alan S. 1993. The Effect of Budget Emphasis and Information Asymmetry on the Relation between  
Budgetary Participation and Slack. The Accounting Review, (68) (2), pp. 400-410.  
Falikhatun. 2007. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penganggaran Terhadap Budgetary Slack Dengan Variabel  
Pemoderasi Ketidakpastian Lingkungan Dan Kohesivitas Kelompok. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan,  
(
6) (2), hal: 207-221.  
Garrison, Ray H, Eric W. Noreen, Peter C. Brewer. 2006. Akuntansi Manajerial, Buku 1. Edisi Sebelas.  
Jakarta: Salemba Empat.  
Govindarajan, Vijay. 1986. Impact of Participation in The Budgetary Process on Managerial Attitudes  
and Performance: Universalistic and Contingency Perspectives. Decision Sciences, (17), Issue 4, pages  
4
96–516.  
Hansen, Dor R. dan Maryanne M. Mowen. 2009. Akuntansi Manajerial, Buku 1. Edisi 8. Jakarta: Salemba  
Empat.  
Hariyanti, Widi. 2002. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran Terhadap Kinerja Manajer: Peran  
Kecukupan Anggaran dan Komitmen Organisasi sebagai Variabel Intervening. Tesis Universitas  
Diponegoro: Semarang.  
Ikhsan, Arfan dan Muhammad Ishak. 2005. Akuntansi Keperilakuan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.  
Indarto, Stefani Lily., dan Stephana Dyah Ayu. 2011. Pengaruh Partisipasi dalam Penyusunan Anggaran  
terhadap Kinerja Manajerial Perusahaan melalui Kecukupan Anggaran, Komitmen Organisasi, Komitmen  
Tujuan Anggaran, dan Job Relevan Information (JRI). Seri Kajian Ilmiah, (14) (1), pp: 1-44.  
Kartika, Andi. 2010. Pengaruh Komitmen Organisasi dan Ketidakpastian Lingkungan dalam Hubungan  
Antara Partisipasi Anggaran dengan Senjangan Anggaran (Studi Empirik pada Rumah Sakit Swasta di  
Kota Semarang). Kajian Akuntansi, (2) (1), hal: 39-60.  
Kosasih, Febry. 2013. Pengaruh Partisipasi Penyusunan Anggaran dengan Senjangan Anggaran Terhadap  
Faktor Kontijensi Sebagai Pemoderasi (Studi Empiris Perbankan di Surabaya). Undergraduate thesis,  
Widya Mandala Catholic University. Surabaya.  
Lowe E. A. and R. W. Shaw. 1968. An Analysis of Managerial Biasing: Evidence From A Company’s  
Budgeting Process. Journal of Management Studies, (5), Issue 3, pp: 304–315.  
Lukka, Kari. 1988. Budgetary Biasing in Organizations: Theoretical Framework and Empirical  
Evidence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, (13) (3), pp: 281-301.  
Lyne, S. 1995. Accounting Measures, Motivation and Performance Appraisal. In D. Ashton, T. Hopper  
nd  
and R. Scapens (eds), Issues in Management Accounting, 2 edition, Prentice Hall, pp: 237-257.  
Maksum, Azhar. 2009. Peran Ketidakpastian Lingkungan dan Karakter Personal dalam Memoderasi  
Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran Terhadap Senjangan Anggaran. Jurnal Keuangan dan Bisnis, (1) (1),  
hal: 1-17.  
Merchant, Kenneth A. 1985. Budgeting and Propersity to Create Budgetary Slack. Accounting,  
Organization, and Society, (10) (2), pp: 201-210.  
Nouri, H. dan R. J. Parker. 1998. The Relationship Between Budget Participation and Job Performance  
The Roles of Budget Adequacy and Organization Commitment, Accounting Organization and Society,  
(
23), pp: 467-483.  
Onsi, M. 1973. “Factor Analysis of Behavioral Variables Affecting Budgetary Slack”. The Accounting  
Review. (48) (3), pp: 535-548.  
(43)  
International Peer-Reviewed Journal  
RESEARCH HORIZONS, VOL. 7 SEPT. 2017  
Ramdeen, Collin, Jocelina Santos and Hyun Kyung Chatfield. 2006. An Examination of Impact of Budgetary  
Participation, Budget Emphasis and Information Asymmetry on Budgetary Slack in The Hotel Industry.  
Ryadi, C. M P. 2015. Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran pada Senjangan Anggaran Dengan Group  
Cohesiveness sebagai Variabel Moderasi. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Udayana.  
Stede, Wim A. Van der. 2000. The Relationship Between Two Consequences of Budgetary Controls:  
Budgetary Slack Creation and Management Short-Term Orientation. Accounting, Auditing and  
Accountabilitiy Journal, (14) (1), pp: 30-52.  
Sugiwardani, Resti. 2012. Analisis Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran, Informasi Asimetris, Budaya dan  
Komitmen Organisasi Terhadap Budgetary Slack. Artikel Ilmiah. STIE Perbanas Surabaya.  
Tresnanty, Astrid. 2015. Pengaruh Penganggaran Partisipatif Terhadap Senjangan Anggaran dengan  
Kepercayaan Manajerial Sebagai Variabel Intervening. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana. (13) (3),  
hal: 240-258.  
Walker, M. and Choudhury, N. 1987. Agency Theory and Management Accounting, In J.A. Arnold, R.  
Scapens and D.Cooper (eds), Management Accounting: Expanding the Horizons, London: Chartered  
Institute of Management Accountants, pp: 61-112.  
Young, S. M. 1985. Participative Budgeting: The Effects of Risk Aversion and Assymetric Informations on  
Budgetary Slack. Journal of Accounting Research (23). pp: 829-842.  
*Faculty of Economics and Business, ** Faculty of Economics, University of Udayana (Unud), Bali,  
(44)